Live framework comparison

This demonstration answers one question: how does the complete MEFI output change when the same relationship path is run with and without a ΔQ event?

—initializing

The experimentCompare one newly fed relationship path with and without its ΔQ event.

The dashed gray trace is the no-event counterfactual. The colored 3D flow is that same current path with the event applied. When it completes, a new path feeds in.

The benefitSee whether a change stays isolated—or propagates through the complete framework.

The comparison exposes the event-driven shift in every coupled value and in the final F_MEFI result.

Live readingDrag the graph to rotate it, use the wheel to zoom, or move over a value to see how it participates in the calculation.

Rotatable MEFI relationship space

path 1 feeding · drag to rotate

time × coupled contribution × value

no-event F_MEFI baseline

scheduled ΔQ event plane

Relationship routeA → B

No-event F_MEFI—

With event—

Event-driven shift—

The live reading will explain what changes at the playhead.

What to look forDashed gray baseline vs cyan active F_MEFI

The gap is the event-attributable change inside the current path. At the end of the run, a newly generated coupled path replaces it.

Largest scenario difference—

Scanning the full scenario…

Why it mattersOne event can alter the complete coupled result.

The peak view identifies when the effect is strongest and which native values moved together.

Scenario Studio

Create a time-based relationship scenario, place one or more ΔQ events, and run the complete framework. Events are not isolated value edits: each one passes through the disclosed illustrative coupling response before every MEFI term is recalculated.

baseline cycle

Starting scenario

Scenario duration24 s

Event time6.0 s

ΔQ amplitude+0.180

Event width1.2 s

Save this scenario in this browser

Baseline cycle

A clean A→B→C relationship cycle with no added events.

0 events

No added ΔQ events

Illustrative scenario coupling: an event changes ΔQ directly and produces disclosed response offsets in k_c, k_r, r, and f_UFR. These offsets make the propagation visible; they are a teaching profile, not an additional MEFI law or sensor measurement.

Dependency propagation

The signal below shows the order of one complete framework recalculation. No coefficient or response is treated as an isolated result.

loading state

1 · Relationship stateA, B, or C at time t

Load the complete native state as one timestamped relationship.

→

2 · Coupled inputsk_c, k_r, r, ΔQ, f_UFR

All five values advance together; none is an independent knob.

→

3 · Exact contributionsexpansion, compression, dynamic

Every contribution is recalculated from the same current state.

→

4 · Complete resultF_MEFI(r,t)

Combine once, preserve the trace, then advance the relationship.

Why this is different from a calculator

A calculator invites the visitor to alter one field while freezing the rest. That gives the wrong impression. In this window, the relationship state is the unit of change: every native value and every downstream term moves with the same timestamp.

What “live” means here

This page runs the disclosed framework continuously against the active illustrative scenario. It demonstrates coupled recalculation and user-created ΔQ events; it is not operational sensor data. Timestamped operational values belong to the Earth UFR monitor.