MEFI Model Comparison Laboratory v4.1 · Corrected kC/kR Contract
MMEFI Model Comparison Laboratory · v4.1
Exact core lockedVisitor inputs: 0Ready to compare
Guided, automatic, fully exposed

Choose the comparison. Watch every step.

This is not a number-entry sandbox. Select a case and the laboratory loads its locked conventional preset and locked native MEFI schedule, runs both sides, draws the results, and opens the complete calculation trail—including every conventional assumption, closure, proxy, correction, and numerical addition. The MEFI inputs change with the selected case while its governing core remains unchanged and no governing mechanism is added.

One unchanged MEFI coreZero MEFI proxiesAutomatic presetsRaw outputs preservedArchived benchmark evidence
Selectable comparisons13
Conventional solvers9
Archived proofs4
MEFI governing cores1 unchanged
MEFI proxies / add-ons0
Current comparison—
Automatic framework comparison

Loading comparison…

✓
MEFI advantage demonstrated

Framework result
Conventional outputlocked preset
MEFI exact outputunchanged core
Declared model burdeneverything counted
Controlled disturbance laboratory

Compare behavior, not just output lines.

The selected conventional model and the selected MEFI schedule are each run twice: once as an undisturbed counterfactual and once with the same timed disturbance protocol. The charts compare normalized change from each model’s own baseline, then open the MEFI response into its coupled inputs and formula terms.

Controlled comparisonEach model is measured against its own no-event run.

This avoids overlaying unlike native units. The common vertical measure is normalized deviation from baseline, not a claim that the raw outputs are the same quantity.

MEFI benefit being testedDoes one disturbance expose a complete, traceable response?

MEFI shows which native values moved, how all three terms changed, and how they recombined into the final result at one timestamp.

Experiment time—
Active ΔQ response—
MEFI peak shift—
Conventional peak shift—
Coupled MEFI values moved—
Preparing the controlled comparison…
Counterfactual responsenormalized deviation from each own baseline
MEFI dependency propagationfive native values · same timestamp
Formula-term attributionexpansion − compression + dynamic
Four-protocol stress testsame selected case · four event structures
Interpretation boundary: the conventional disturbance trace is a locked perturbation of that model’s displayed independent coordinate and reports its normalized output change. The MEFI trace is a locked illustrative coupled-response profile applied to its native schedule. This tests response visibility and auditability; it does not assert that unlike native outputs share physical units.

Show your work

Nothing here is hidden behind a score. The governing relations, fixed presets, assumptions, analysis steps, and exact substitutions are listed below.

Conventional side—
Everything used on this side
MEFI exact-core side1 governing core · 0 additions
0Proxy or add-on governing mechanisms.
Post-simulation diagnostics can measure completed output, but they never replace, modify, or generate the MEFI state.
Locked native input schedule

Raw calculation trail

Selected rows are shown here; the downloaded record contains the complete run.

Nine conventional structures. One MEFI core.

The framework matrix keeps every category separate: governing relations, auxiliary or closure laws, approximations/proxies, assumptions, and numerical machinery.

ComparisonConventional governingAuxiliary / closureProxy / approximationAssumptionsNumerical machineryMEFI coreMEFI added lawsMEFI proxies
Source and interpretation

Built-in reproducible case
MEFI Model Comparison Laboratory v4.1 · All visitor-facing comparisons and controlled disturbance experiments run locally in the page. Synthetic scenarios characterize response behavior; they are not empirical validation. Raw conventional outputs retain native coordinates and units; controlled overlays use normalized deviation from each model’s own baseline. Every MEFI schedule uses the corrected canonical core: kc/r² expansion − kr/[r²(1+r)] compression + ΔQ·fUFR. C and Π remain diagnostic outputs, not replacement dynamics.